Greater than 1 / 4 of jobs within the OECD depend on abilities that might be simply automated within the coming synthetic intelligence revolution, and staff worry they might lose their jobs to AI, the OECD mentioned on Tuesday.
The Organisation for Financial Co-operation and Growth (OECD) is a 38-member bloc, spanning largely rich nations but in addition some rising economies like Mexico and Estonia.
There may be little proof the emergence of AI is having a big impression on jobs to this point, however which may be as a result of the revolution is in its early phases, the OECD mentioned.
Jobs with the best threat of being automated make up 27% of the labor pressure on common in OECD international locations, with japanese European international locations most uncovered, the Paris-based group mentioned in its 2023 Employment Outlook.
Jobs at highest threat had been outlined as these utilizing greater than 25 of the 100 abilities and skills that AI consultants contemplate could be simply automated.
Three out of 5 staff in the meantime worry that they might lose their job to AI over the following 10 years, the OECD present in a survey final yr. The survey coated 5,300 staff in 2,000 companies spanning manufacturing and finance throughout seven OECD international locations.
The survey was carried out earlier than the explosive emergence of generative AI like ChatGPT.
Regardless of the anxiousness over the arrival of AI, two-thirds of staff already working with it mentioned that automation had made their jobs much less harmful or tedious.
“How AI will finally impression staff within the office and whether or not the advantages will outweigh the dangers, will rely on the coverage actions we take,” OECD Secretary Basic Mathias Cormann instructed a information convention.
“Governments should assist staff to organize for the modifications and profit from the alternatives AI will result in,” he continued.
Minimal wages and collective bargaining may assist ease the strain that AI may placed on wages whereas governments and regulators want to make sure staff rights usually are not compromised, the OECD mentioned.
