Gabriel Weinberg, founder and chief government officer of DuckDuckGo Inc., speaks throughout a Senate Judiciary Committee listening to in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, March 12, 2019.
Al Drago | Bloomberg | Getty Pictures
Google’s unique contracts proved to be an “impediment” for DuckDuckGo in pitching browsers on changing into the default search engine for his or her personal searching modes, DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg testified in federal courtroom on Thursday.
DuckDuckGo, recognized for its privacy-centric search engine that rivals Google’s, had sooner or later pitched its search engine to be the default in personal searching modes of different browsers, Weinberg testified in Washington, D.C., District Courtroom.
Google is going through allegations from the Division of Justice and a coalition of state attorneys normal that it violated antitrust regulation by means of the usage of exclusionary contracts to be the default search engine on browsers like Apple’s Safari and on telephones that use Google’s Android working system.
“We thought it was an incredible pitch to browsers, truthfully,” Weinberg mentioned throughout questioning by an lawyer for the Justice Division.
DuckDuckGo’s personal analysis has discovered that many customers aren’t conscious that personal searching modes don’t present as a lot monitoring safety as they might count on. Weinberg mentioned the corporate offered that data to browser makers, exhibiting that personal searching can mislead customers, providing DuckDuckGo as an answer to that drawback.
“We actually took that pitch fairly far and extensive,” Weinberg mentioned. Regardless of garnering curiosity, he mentioned they “hit an impediment” with firms’ contracts with Google.
Ultimately, DuckDuckGo determined that “it was a quixotic train,” Weinberg mentioned.
A Google spokesperson declined to touch upon the testimony.
WATCH: DOJ takes on Google in historic antitrust lawsuit over search dominance
